Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PFTB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --- Glen 04:27, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PFTB

Only some fringe sources, like answers.com, not much else indicating notability to any substantial degree, lots of confusion with an obscure chemistry term, looks like Wikipedia could do without it, or have it merged into else. Kmaguir1 03:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

• answers.com is a Wikipedia mirror. And this article is unverifiable. It cites no sources, and a search for sources turns up nothing. The obscure chemistry term is perfluoro-t-butanol. Delete. Uncle G 03:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. I don't think this is a hoax, but the label Line Out Records doesn't list anything like PFTB, nor does the OVNI website, which goes to WP:V. Allmusic was uncharacteristically baffled. Fails WP:MUSIC in any case, lacking any multiple third-party non-trivial articles. Tychocat 10:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per Tychocat. Zaxem 02:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per above. GumbyProf: "I'm about ideas, but I'm not always about good ideas." 19:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.