The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Not notable and no assertion thereof. Almost no ghits [1]. Akihabara 14:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - not a very notable license and hardly any google results Jayden54 21:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - these licenses change from use to use (hopefully, if they've got a good lawyer and translator) and none of them would really be notable/encyclopedic. SkierRMH,08:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.