Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PDF Zone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PDF Zone

This entry does not meet the requirements of WP:WEB. No changes were made after deletion of the prod tag by an anon. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 13:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Aaron 16:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete lacks verification to satisfy WP:WEB.-- danntm ^T _C 19:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It's part of a notable company, Ziff-Davis, and I added references. I first heard about this web site from the general manager of a printing company who recommended it. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Being owned by a big company doesn't assert notability, those references are not from reliable sources and do absolutely nothing to assert any importance for the site (one is three sentences, and the other is nothing but a link back to the site!), and pdfzone.com has an Alexa rank of below 90,000. -- Kicking222 12:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as WP:SPAM. Article created by single purpose account[1]. Encyclopedically non-notable part of notable company. Recommend Speedy Delete under new "shoot on sight" guideline as per "Corporate vanity policy enforcement" by Brad Patrick, General Counsel and Interim Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation. Bwithh 19:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Ooh, I'm going to have to hold on to a copy of that memo! Thanks for pointing that out, Bwithh. (Note to Brad Patrick: Revert back to the original system of handing out admin tools - remember that line of Jimbo's about how "Getting adminship should be no big deal"? - and maybe you'd have the workforce you need to handle this sort of thing.) --Aaron 23:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Bwithh; CSD G11, but alas no longer speedyable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.