Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PDF-Office Professional

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. SPAs taken into account. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PDF-Office Professional

PDF-Office Professional (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Originally PROD'd, but PROD removed without commment. This is a shareware program with no external evidence of notability. Delete. Isotope23 talk 03:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, advert. Realkyhick 03:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable, I couldn't find any press coverage besides stuff obviously sourced from a press release. --Darkwind (talk) 04:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 05:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • jDelete.speedy Doesn't assert notability and doesn't sound notable. DMacks 19:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep online: Very interesting Europe´s main competitor to Adobe Professionals form creation tool. Here are some publishers notes

http://www.it-enquirer.com/main/ite/more/pdf_office_7/ http://www.designtaxi.com/news.jsp?id=1510&monthview=1&month=11&year=2005 http://www.planetpdf.com/enterprise/article.asp?ContentID=This_week_in_PDF_-_Planet_PDF_goes_on_the_road&gid=7499 http://www.mactechpress.com/news/?p=1009761 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.130.43.195 (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

  • KEEP !!, interesting tool, cool Adobe alternative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.130.46.145 (talk) 13:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep 37000 results from google for phrase "pdf-Office Professional" from many sites. I think there is some notability --Mpx 15:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.