Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCSX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep ViridaeTalk 11:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PCSX

PCSX (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Emulator that does not appear to meet WP:SOFTWARE inclusion criteria, or be notable, or have reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 15:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. PCSX was one of the premiere Playstation emulators, along with Bleem. It was the starting point for the PCSX2 project. If PCSX isn't notable, PCSX2 (the only current Playstation 2 emulation project) should be nominated also. — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 15:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as not asserting notability. I'm not sure if it's possible to objectively assess whether something is "premiere". I don't see how the deletion of this article would automatically make PCSX2 non-notable, but feel free to nominate it and we'll discuss it. Demiurge 17:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 05:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep If you delete this article then you might aswell shove every other noteable emulator article into the chopping block.Atirage 07:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I wouldn't be totally against merging it into the PCSX2 article (which is definitely notable), but it shoudn't be deleted. —SirPavlova 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's an interesting project. - Brian Kendig 18:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not a single source anywhere to indicate its notability or verify any of the claims in the article. Hbdragon88 05:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: since the PCSX2 probably emulates the PSX as well, isn't this just an earlier build of sorts like NO$GB (which became NO$GBA) and Kega (which became Kega Fusion)? If so, just redirect it there. GarrettTalk 07:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect Per Garrett. The Kinslayer 09:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per Dark Shikari. While I agree this article could use work, and should possibly be marked as a stub, PCSX is definitely a notable piece of software. Significant development, use, and availability (it is, to my knowledge, the only significantly compatible PS emulator that runs under OS X for example). A quick web search also reveals reviews and other media coverage, which all add support to its notability (per WP:SOFTWARE). From wiki deletion policy, "articles and text which are capable of meeting these should usually be remedied by editing", so even if it needs work, I disagree with deleting it. At most, I would vote for a weak merge with PCSX2, perhaps in a "history section", if no one steps forward after a reasonable time to further edit this article. However, I think it is capable of supporting its own article. xoa 05:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.