Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS idents

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, even after minus socks. - Mailer Diablo 07:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PBS idents

Subtrivia of interest only to devoted logospotters. tregoweth 23:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete this belongs on Wikicities or a fan site. No way is this encyclopaedic. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 23:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I don't see how this is any less encyclopaedic than some of the other articles on Wikipedia. Boring as hell, but I think merits inclusion. Movementarian 00:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep --Quarl 01:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - There is a nostalgia factor here. Endomion 01:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep definately interesting to see how it has evolved over the years. --Pboyd04 02:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep what the hell, we have BBC Television Idents Jcuk 20:29, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per Pboyd04. Georgia guy 00:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - of nostalgic and aesthetic interest. But, as Movementarian says, it's not well written. Also, too similar to teamfx2000 page (referenced multiple times). ScottMainwaring 03:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Good Histoy on PBS 69.231.157.85
  • Keep This is historical information Mike 17:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and cleanup. David | Talk 17:31, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Majority rules. I think there are some psychological effects to the older idents for some or for me at least. It may not be really encyclopaediac, but useful and easy to get to for the info. Steven312 01:48, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Exactly it's information that will be of use to many people and it's obviously overwheling that most people want it to say. Mike 02:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep --Lukobe 06:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.