Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.T. Grimm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] P.T. Grimm

P.T. Grimm (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

Non-notable band Missvain 03:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails to meet WP:BAND. Hello32020 03:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Unfortunately, this band seems to not have any press except for this rockzone.com review [1], not much notability. The label listed in their article, Disgraceland Records, does not have any mention of them on their website. Without information about their former albums, it's pretty hard to figure out which ones were released by Disgraceland and which were not. None of the bands or artists listed on Disgraceland Records's website appears to have a Wikipedia article, so it's difficult not to conclude they fail the "more important indie label" test of Wikipedia:Notability (music). No other evidence of P.T. Grimm's notability seemed to be present in a google search. Darkspots 04:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 04:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete; it does fail to meet WP:BAND and does not have much notabilitySkierRMH 07:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BAND ST47Talk 12:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as failing WP:BAND. --Nehwyn 13:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable, etc. Spinach Dip 20:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.