Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozura Mobile (second nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Ezeu 19:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ozura Mobile

Notability concerns, seems like spam, not encyclopedic. Very limited references. The article has been previously speedy deleted (g11) and was recreated. The new article is not substantially different to the old. I think it be should be Deleted under SPAM/Notability guidelines. MidgleyDJ 21:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Weak Delete - Although unencyclopedic, Google search returned many results, and some of them are not from the company. With the current information, it looks like spam, but it can be improved. Cheers -- Imoeng 01:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep due to removal of POV wording. It's still a stub, but it's a NPOV stub now. All the marketing-speak has been removed, and several press coverage links have been added. The article meets WP:CORP based on the articles currently listed under "Press coverage". ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - This article appears to be of no value at all. It's merely a list of games the company makes. That's not an encyclopedia entry, that's an advertisement. The Kinslayer 12:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Strong Delete - Follwing a look at Ozuras user page, I believe it is incontrevertably proven that this is an advertisement. And attempting to add a 'keep' comment and signing it with a different name is just stupid. We CAN check the history and see who ACTUALLY posted that comment you know. The Kinslayer 09:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
    • That could be why the article is listed as a stub. Many company articles started off as little more than lists of what the company had produced. Just being a stub is not a criteria for deletion, and neither is being only a list of games. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 16:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Other game companies like Gameloft is doing the similar way. Why should be this article deleted. Ozura 14:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The external links look like press releases, not the indpendent coverage that is needed to meet WP:CORP. GRBerry 18:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.