Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Belles (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G12. Copyvio from: [1], which itself is a copy of [2]. Mangojuice^talk 14:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oxford Belles

Oxford Belles (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Tagged as G4, repost of content deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Belles, but content is different and there were only two !votes. Subject scores under 120 ghits, among which I did not see, at a quick skim, anything which might count as a reliable source, nor did I see any evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC. Looks like vanispamcruftisement, but you decide. Guy (Help!) 12:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. This group fails WP:MUSIC. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 13:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Carefully ready the article and there is no assertion as to why they are notable. Marked it for speedy under A7. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep have come across them a few times, they are something of an Oxford insitution and have been on TV and performed at major events (not just in Oxford). --SandyDancer 13:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Clearly fails to assert any notability. scope_creep 14:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.