Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overworld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Overworld

Overworld (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Completely original research, no references or sources despite the need for them being brought up on the talk page several months ago. Miremare 13:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

• Transwiki to Wiktionary, and weak delete A Google News Search indicates that this is definitely a term in common use, but the info in the article really should be sourced, and without references that indicate that this information is not only true, but notable in the field of video game development, I'm having a hard time believing that anyone should care. Propaniac 13:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Actually, no reason to Transwiki that I see (the definition is already included there), so strike that. Propaniac 13:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO, WP:ATT, WP:DICDEF and Propaniac. EyeSerene^TALK 16:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO, WP:ATT, WP:DICDEF and Propaniac. Geuiwogbil 23:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.