The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page☎ ) 07:13, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Non-notable word/topic. 156 Google hits. ComputerJoe 14:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete. per nom. [1]. PJM 14:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Reluctant Keep. It makes sense. Skyscrap27 14:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. B.ellis 16:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Keep per Skyscrap27. Shows up in some scholarly articles. -- JJay 23:55, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete neologism. —Ruud 21:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.