Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over the hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 00:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Over the hill

Over the hill (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a transwikied dictionary definition, completely unsourced and consisting of nothing but original research.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 20:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Or merge with Ageism. Anthony Appleyard 20:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - no merge is needed. This is useless original research which the ageism article will not benefit from.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 21:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Arbustoo 07:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, Wiktionary is a good place for definitions and Wikipedia is a bad place for original research. -- phoebe/(talk) 08:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.