Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outwar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Outwar

Outwar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Still no reliable, independent references. Tenuous claim to notability not supported by reliable citation. Riddled with indiscriminate information (WP:NOT), original research (WP:OR) and pov (WP:NPOV). Marašmusïne_Talk 17:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm adding these two related articles to this AFD discussion. Jauerback 18:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Crowns of Power (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Rampid Interactive (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marašmusïne_Talk 17:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB, too. Jauerback 17:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• I support the nomination of the related articles Crowns of Power and Rampid Interactive. The former is appallingly vague, containing only game instructions and seems promotional. Both suffer from a lack of importance (WP:N) and the ol' no references thing (WP:V). Marašmusïne_Talk 19:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete origional research--Sefringle^Talk 04:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not one source or reference, looks to be an advert. Fin©™ 22:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:WEB - no reliable sources, not notable. spam Giggy _U^CP 23:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - No reliable sources, unverifiable claims of notability, fails WP:WEB. I tagged trhis articl3e about these concerns months ago and nothing has been done in the meantime. Still expecting people to say 'keep, it's notable' without saying how it;s notable, or providing sources. Always seems to happen with these games. DarkSaber2k 10:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete subject is not notable, article does not even attempt to establish some. --User:Krator (t c) 10:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.