Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outsourcing to India 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Business process outsourcing in India. – Avi 16:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Outsourcing to India

Page was recreated by User:Asirp on 30 June, 2006. Previous discussion. Currently a non-objective article spam-linking to outsourcing firms in India.  Netsnipe  CVU ^(Talk)  07:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom; WP:OR and WP:ADS--TBCTaLk?!? 08:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, fails WP:NOR and WP:ADS. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 09:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment, note that WP:ADS and WP:SPAM are actually links to the same guideline. I use WP:ADS since some editors find it offensive when their articles are called spam, since the word "spam" has a negative connotation.--TBCTaLk?!? 10:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete promotional essay. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no content worth merging into outsourcing - most is just an ad as noted above. Kuru ^talk 14:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Redirect as per Ganeshk Dlyons493 Talk 21:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect to outsourcing. SM247^{My Talk} 01:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect to Business process outsourcing in India. - Ganeshk (talk) 05:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Ganeshk -- Lost 05:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, spam, linkfarm, promo KleenupKrew 10:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Ganesh. ImpuMozhi 01:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.