Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside Closer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 02:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Outside Closer

Outside Closer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unnotable album that fails WP:MUSIC. Brewcrewer 05:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, studio album by a notable band. Article contains enough info to warrant keeping it if you adhere to the 'albums with not much info should be redirected' philosophy (which I don't, as it happens). Finally, numerous excellent sources are linked in the infobox. This passes the relevent notability guidelines with ease. J Milburn 11:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I've pointed out in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hood (band) why I think the band is notable, and there are WP:RS for this album. [1][2] [3] Bláthnaid 14:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, but please add the cites to the article before closing this AfD. Bearian 00:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC) I did it myself, so anyone else can close this AfD. Bearian 00:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.