Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outercourse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Flowerparty☀ 00:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Outercourse

Dictionary definition of a pun on "intercourse." Brian G. Crawford 21:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep Certainly isn't a dictionary definition - they are normally one liners, this is a complete article. --Tango 21:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I have heard this term used by professionals in the field (not of outercourse...), but it does need referencing. —porges_(talk) 21:59, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep it shows up in dictionary.com, and the current article is far more than a dictdef. --BillC 22:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Very strong keep, often promoted as an alternative to intercourse, not a "pun" as nom indicates. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 22:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, nomination based on invalid reasoning—Clearly not a dictionary definition.--Sean Black ^(talk) 22:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep more than a definition. -- Joebeone (Talk) 22:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keepdifferent to sexual intercourse although exhibiting similar charecteristics Abc85 17:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - it's taught in sex education nowadays. -- Jjjsixsix ^(t)/_(c) @ 04:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.