Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outer FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete CSD G3 (Note: I am just closing the AfD after the article was deleted by another admin) --Angelo (talk) 16:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Outer FC

Outer FC (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Blatant hoax club created by User:Hello01. I am Italian, I've never ever heard of this club, and I've found no track of its existence in the Internet. Angelo (talk) 11:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Angelo (talk) 11:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete no mention on the official Serie D website, no relevant Ghits for "outer" "milan" "calcio", blatantly false info (1973-74 Serie B title was actually won by A.S. Varese 1910),badge has clearly been knocked up in MS Paint or similar, name is a feeble English-language play on Inter Milan. Need I go on.....? ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Obvious hoax. пﮟოьεԻ 57 12:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. GiantSnowman (talk) 12:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as hoax ive never heard of or seen this Football Club on the web or anywhere else. A look through the web again shows no sign of any existance. Dewster^{_^*'_} 12:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete It looks like the pictures were made on Microsoft Paint.--Dr.orfannkyl (talk) 13:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Obvious hoax. Liked the socks though. Sebisthlm (talk) 13:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Query Just out of interest, can anyone work out where the photo was actually taken.....? ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as obvious hoax. I wonder why they took the time writing the article when the logo is so obviously a 2-minute MSPaint quickie. Apparently even the hoaxer got bored and couldn't be bothered. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete As hoax. Tagging with nonsence because someone has to put a stop to keeping crap like this around for one minute more than necessary. Five days? Why? DarkAudit (talk) 15:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Actually, G3 for vandalism now covers blatant hoaxes such as this. DarkAudit (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.