Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outbehave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Outbehave

Outbehave (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

"The word 'Out-behave' is not a word currently recognised by any dictionary". 550 ghits. To make things worse, this contested prod is vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 11:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable neologism, dicdef, inappropriate tone, and of course, my favorite... vanispamifragilisticexpialidocious. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 12:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 14:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, I love learning neologisms, but they don't start at WP, and this one said so little about the meaning of the word as to be a WP:COATRACK also. John J. Bulten (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - unsupported neologism, created by an SPA and verging on SPAM. JohnCD (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Verkhovensky (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.