Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Scotland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Our Scotland

An online discussion forum with 247 members, and no other indication that it remotely meets the criteria of WP:WEB. Middenface 09:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom.--blue520 10:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no alexa rank either. --Eivind^t@c 10:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Kimchi.sg 10:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:34, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Cactus.man ✍ 10:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 11:16, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - adspamlinkwpcolonnot etc etc - Richardcavell 11:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - has also been linkspammed onto the Acts of Union 1707 page, among others Cynical 12:34, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Mendor 14:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Nominator has not made case for deletion sufficiently.--TheMadTim 16:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment No? He said it doesn't meet the criteria for what it is. If you can show otherwise, that's fine, but that's plenty of reason to delete. Darquis 22:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete As per nom. Darquis 22:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Does not meet WP:WEB. — TheKMan^talk 23:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Eivind --Deville (Talk) 03:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 05:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.