Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otaku's Dream Mix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, could even have been considered a G7. Protection not required. - Daniel Bryant 10:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Otaku's Dream Mix

Otaku's Dream Mix (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A fan-made Stepmania mix which has no reliable sources written about it, failing WP:ATT's source requirements. The only references are to the group's website. Delete. Wickethewok 06:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• I am the primary writer of this article. Wikipedia does allow primary sources per WP:ATT. No specialist knowledge is needed to check these facts: one need only download the pack and see the names of all members included in the project. One need only click the external link to otakusdream.com to see that, in fact, Jubo is the leader because it's his site and he says so ^_^ . One need only click the WhoIs.net reference to prove the registration date as true. I believe this article passes WP:ATT's criterion for primary sources. Neither does the article violate WP:OR as it does not make any attempts to assert a claim. Keep. --Naruttebayo 07:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Even if it is verifiable, it is definitely non-notable. --Mus Musculus 15:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. It doesn't at all pass the primary source test, which is reliable sources written about it, not the mere fact that it exists. Beyond that, "[e]dits that rely on primary sources should only make descriptive claims that can be checked by anyone without specialist knowledge." RGTraynor 20:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

• I concede at the request of Jubo. Please delete/protect the article page, whatever is deemed appropriate. --Naruttebayo 04:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

• A protect is certainly not necessary. Wickethewok 04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.