The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Lack of independent references establishing notability, bordering on spam. Does not appear to meet WP:COMPANY. WWGB (talk) 22:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete Not notable, also doesn't meet with WP:COMPANY.--RyRy5talk 22:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete Lacks notability, lacks sourcing, reads like an advert, the only Google News hit is a company report from Experian. This suggests existence but not notability. - Dravecky (talk) 23:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.