Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osmotrophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Titoxd^(?!?) 03:42, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Osmotrophy

Does this make any sense to anyone? R. fiend 17:03, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Not me; delete as nonsense. Tempshill 17:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep as perfectly comprehensible term (except the author failed to include the word "active" in "active uptake", making it indistinguishable from Osmosis as it stands). "I don't understand it" is not a criterion for deletion; if it were I'd be voting to delete one heck of a lot of games-related articles! Tonywalton  | Talk 17:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I see, it's been completely rewritten by Uncle G. Actually makes sense now. I'll withdraw this. -R. fiend 17:51, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep all articles rewritten by Uncle G. Kappa 00:49, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.