Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osmond's Pyramid of Incompetence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Osmond's Pyramid of Incompetence
AfDs for this article:
Pure original research. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 12:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination - the only people on the whole Internet who mention this subject are... Wikipedia. In this article. Srpnor (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 12:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Not very compelling OR: a complete mis-reading of the Peter principle. --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete And at least The Peter Principle achieved wide recognition after being part of a bestselling book. The article has three cites, all of which are to something other than anything that Professor Osmond has published-- assuming he's published anything, that is. Mandsford (talk) 12:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, yet another management theory whose chief merit is its catchy title; no notability shown in the article itself. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as above and nom. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as an essay composed almost entirely of original research. When I saw the article's title, I thought that it was going to be an essay on the Donny Osmond-hosted revival of Pyramid... Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Now that would make a good game show: Donny Osmond's Pyramid of Incompetence!, with two celebrities and two regular contestants, all clueless. Mandsford (talk) 02:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Delete per nom. --Snigbrook (talk) 01:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.