Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Lusth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Mets501 (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oscar Lusth

Oscar Lusth (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is one of the many Survivor contestant articles where the person really isn't notable. Through the many AFD's, it has become clear that, unless the player has won the show, did something really, really notable on the show, or did something notable outside of the show, they really don't deserve an article. TeckWizTalkContribs@ 18:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

  • KeepDelete as the show is still in progress. If/when he's voted off then nominate, but this is premature Not notable and might as well kill it now. Otto4711 19:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Not sure if this goes into consideration, but he did appear in Playboy's Fourplay, and is noted elsewhere in wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebrity_sex_tape
  • Delete because he doesn't meet notability guidelines. Yet. Slideshow Bob 12:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

*Hold-On. We are now only two days from the finalle, and the declaration of the winner. Both Oscar Lusth and Sundra Oakley are up for AFD, but both are also still in the running. If either of them wins, that will make a major change in their notability status. It does not make much sense to me to close either or both of these AFDs and delete the articles when in only two days there may be a dramatic shift in the notability situation for one of them. If these AFDs are closed and one of them wins, then the article will need to be recreated within days of it's deletion. If the AFDs can be held from closing for just a couple more days, we can avoid that situation and know for sure if one of them is the winner. I'm not arguing that these articles are premature, and if these AFDs were being held a few weeks back I would have said to torch the articles. But at this point, this close to the end, if the AFDs can just stay open for a couple more days.... - TexasAndroid 18:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or Redirect to this season's Survivor article. Did not win, so not really notable as the runner up. - TexasAndroid 04:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as 1st runner up. Edison 04:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Honestly I believe anyone in the final vote should be notable enough for the pedia.. His other exploits seem to only reinforce it. EnsRedShirt 04:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep He was the runner-up, popular among the viewers, and he was the most competitive in the challenges. Actually he deserved to win. Gtrojan 05:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I created this article, so I wouldn't be voting on whether to keep or delete this it, but since he ended up being the runner-up, we shouldn't get rid of the aricle now. --The President of Cool 05:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Memorable contestant. Very popular. --Thankyoubaby 07:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Notable Survivor contestant. Pcpp 12:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Notable contestant in the game in his own right, plus the celebrity sex tape reference. Plus there's previous form, with Kelly Wiglesworth, Kim Johnson, Neleh Dennis, Clay Jordan, Matthew Von Ertfelda, Twila Tanner, Katie Gallagher and Danielle DiLorenzo all having articles when they have realistically done nothing notable other than finish second in Survivor (I have excluded Colby, Boston Rob and Stephenie from this list as they have notability either outside their single second place finish or outside Survivor in general). Jxan3000 13:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
These people don't deserve articles. And many of them were listed by me at a combined AFD, which was closed with no consensus. These people aren't notable either. TeckWizTalkContribs@ 22:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • keep second place. others in 2nd also have articles. Reywas92Talk 22:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Read note below before reading vote-Keep Oscar should have his own article. I agree with other users that he is a notable contestent. Scentzoom 20:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Note-This is users first and only edit. TeckWizTalkContribs@ 22:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: He finished second, thus making him notable. -- Scorpion 19:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.