Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orlando nieuwoudt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. theProject 20:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orlando nieuwoudt

How is he notable? Green caterpillar 15:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Delete Green caterpillar 15:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Just because you have not heard of him does not mean this cannot reside on this site. Dont be such a kiljoy.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.19.88.12 (talk • contribs)

• Delete - shouldn't this have been pushed through as a speedy? There's not assertion of notability. In fact, the article is almost content free. -- Whpq 15:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per WP:BIO. Please see Burden of Evidence -- it is the responsibility of the author(s) of this page to cite verifiable sources establishing notability. "Just because we have not heard of him" means you must convince us, with verifiable sources, that he is notable and merits an encyclopedia entry. Scorpiondollprincess 16:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:BIO WilyD 16:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete CSD A7. Nothing here to even debate. Fan-1967 16:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - An article needs more than a place and date of birth. But we might give the writer a day or two to add data to establish notability. Badbilltucker 17:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy A7, tagged as such. A restatement of the name, followed by date and place of birth, is not an appropriate stub. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.