Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orkney Beekeepers' Association
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orkney Beekeepers' Association
Delete - notability not established. --Mais oui! 22:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No notability established. But more importantly, no verifiability or sources. Borderline speedy candidate as db-group and db-empty. Metros232 22:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete far too obscure to warrant an article --RMHED 23:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I believe this association has a connexion with the inventor/invention of the “Glen” hive - something about which I assume you know absolutely nothing, Mais oui! – so please let us keep this stub for someone with the appropriate knowledge (a Wekepedian?) to add to. Mallimak 23:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment well do you have sources for this "connexion" that you believe exists? Metros232 01:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Dionyseus 00:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable and non-notable organization. Theoretically this could be speedy A3ed as the article is essentially just a rephrasing of the title. --Kinu t/c 02:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not only has its notability not been established, its very existence has not been established, either. So, delete per nom. --Calton | Talk 02:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, the article contains no claims of anything notable, let alone proof of notability. Nuttah68 17:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Userify until evidence of the existence of the organization, its connexion with the hive, or its survival after 1939 is presented. Septentrionalis 22:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.