Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organized Konfusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 10:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Organized Konfusion

This page was deleted before as Organised Confusion (see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Organized Confusion) this appears to be an alternative spelling that the creator redirected. Delete Deathawk 00:58, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Comment: The AfD log linked to in the nomination doesn't have a vote for "Organised confusion" or the misspelling noted. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 01:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Ok fixed it I think what I saw was a list of deleted articles but regardless if you look at "what links here" and click on the Deletion Log thingy you'll see it was deleted once. Deathawk 02:00, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

• Allright then, Delete -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 02:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. WTF? I mean, seriously, WTF? Organised Confusion (as deleted by VFD consensus in November 2004) was apparently "an independent rockband from Amelia, Ohio", with no assertion of notability. This article, Organized Konfusion, predates the other (first revision, April 25, 2003), and is about a totally different band. Organized Konfusion had multiple releases on notable independant labels, which are all still widely available (search amazon.com or music.barnesandnoble.com), and member Pharaohe Monch has a currently active solo career. Clearly meets notability criteria set out in WP:MUSIC. --Stormie 06:15, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep as misinformed nomination, per Stormie. --Quarl 07:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep - three albums on two major labels (Hollywood and Priority) qualify as notable, but the article needs updating. B.Wind 07:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, or speedy keep if the nominator will withdraw this nomination. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Is it just me or are we playing a lot more Pin-the-AfD-on-the-Article these days? --Agamemnon2 08:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Not just you. -- JJay 08:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• keep please this notable erasing it does not make any sense at all Yuckfoo 08:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep notable group, despite sharing the name with a non-notable one Tuf-Kat 22:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.