Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organic time

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 03:35, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Organic time

Original research. See Wikipedia:No original research. Was also a signed essay. Originally concluded: "For time travelling , we must know better our temporal mechanisms, and surely we will obtain an constructive answer to this problem"Kappa 07:08, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Original research. JoaoRicardo 07:43, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. -- Curps 11:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original Research. utcursch 12:20, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. HyperZonk 16:47, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research (written by someone who speaks English as a second language), drivel iced with copy-pastes from a reference text. Welcome to the information age. Wyss 18:39, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.