Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrganicPoetry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. brenneman(t)(c) 11:11, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] OrganicPoetry

To start with, there's the neologistic title. Then the page goes off into what appear to be random fragments of other people's web sites. Then it wanders into some long quotations that don't immediately seem to me to be apropos of its title. A salvage job just might be possible here, but I suspect that even that should be under a different title. Jmabel | Talk 02:08, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete This could have been speedied as patent nonsense (yes, the CSD kind). Incomprehensible random collection of what appears to be machine-collected prose snippets, or some sort of bot that reads blogs, or something. -- MCB 08:00, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as patent nonsense. I've cleaned up Organic poetry but if the concept is just a fringe thing, that may need deletion too. - Mgm|(talk) 13:23, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete And I thought organic poetry was poetry made out of tofu. Karmafist 18:58, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, patent nonsense. Although perhaps it should be kept and given time to grow organically. HA HA HA AfD clichés slay me every time. Lord Bob 19:57, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Organic and compost are pretty much the same thing, aren't they? User:Zoe|(talk) 23:37, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Given the clear and prompt consensus, is there any reason not to speedy it at this point? Certainly not unprecedented to do so. -- 06:12, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Hearing no objection, I will speedy-delete. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:11, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.