Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oragon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deletion. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 05:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oragon

This is an essay about a non-english word. Original research, and wouldn't belong on the english wikipedia even if it had sources Xyzzyplugh 11:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per above. Interestingly, the article on the Bicolanos makes no reference to them being called this. BigHaz 11:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The word pops up in context with 50 hits on Google, but notability is not the issue. This is OR, written in the first person, and would seem to violate WP-is-not-a-soapbox. If edited-down to WP-style, it's not clear it would be more than a dicdef at that point. Tychocat 11:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: It appears to be an essay in identity politics. As such, it seems to be a refugee from a blog. The term does not appear to be commonplace, and the article is an elaborate dictionary re-definition. Geogre 12:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Rambling, creepy original research. --Xrblsnggt 19:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as OR. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 22:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.