Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oprah, Uma. Uma, Oprah.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Oprah, Uma. Uma, Oprah.

Dave Letterman makes a lot of jokes. We don't need articles for each of them. FreplySpang (talk) 23:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Aurochs (Talk | Block)
• Ditto. - Lucky 6.9 23:58, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Although this is one of Letterman's more infamous jokes, it's hardly reached catchphrase status. It can easily be covered either in the David Letterman or Academy Awards articles. Doesn't need its own. 23skidoo 02:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete POV (who says Uma is an "ugly" name?) and unencyclopaedic. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 12:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, entirely useless. Besides, the joke about Oprah Winfrey marrying Deepak Chopra was funnier. — JIP | Talk 12:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia should not become a repository for pop culture drivel. --Bachrach44 15:41, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, wouldn't Wikipedia be a weird place if all Letterman jokes were made into articles. However, I think if we just do articles on the funny ones, I'm sure it wouldn't be too much work..... Croat Canuck 02:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete one small part of an overall fiasco that can be dealt with in a number of different articles. Jtmichcock 02:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.