Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opposite sex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Disambiguate. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 04:17Z

[edit] Opposite sex

Opposite sex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This isn't really an article about anything. There's nothing that could be included here which isn't already in other articles on gender, discrimination, etc. ConDemTalk 05:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. A dictionary definition fleshed out with material better treated elsewhere. That table may be the funniest thing I've ever seen on Wikipedia. —Celithemis 05:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
    Yeah, the table was great. That almost saved it. ConDemTalk 05:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Gender. And send table to BJAODN.--Húsönd 05:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Changed to Disambiguate per Mister Manticore.--Húsönd 02:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect per above. Sorry, I reverted the table. It can still go to BJAODN, though. --N Shar 05:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • The table has been BJAODN'd. --N Shar 05:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Gender per above. Table is worthy addition to BJAODN :) Orderinchaos78 06:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect. As Orderinchaos78 said, Table is worthy addition to BJAODN :)! lol I totally agree. Mathmo Talk 10:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect per above. But I should point out there were no sources cited for that table. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect per WP:OR, because the table is original research (as Sjakkalle rightly said, it isn't sourced). If someone can perhaps source the table, I would say speedy keep. (the table is a great addition to BJAODN) Cream147 Shout at me for doing wrong 16:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect per aboce, and my goodness that table is a hoot. -- Whpq 17:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Disambig per FrozenPurpleCube. The presence of the other articles means we should provide a disambig page. -- Whpq 22:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate While a redirect to Gender isn't a problem, I do think given the Opposite Sex (TV series), The Opposite Sex, even The Opposite of Sex, it would be appropriate to make this a disambig page instead of redirecting. I would include an entry to Gender though. FrozenPurpleCube 18:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate per above. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate per above reasoning. This is a reasonable search term, just not a reasonable article. -- nae'blis 22:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: for crying out now, can't you deletionist just do some bold edit of redirect and get on with it?! 154.5.47.4 09:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • We're waiting for a consensus on this (i.e, we're waiting for this to be closed) before we disambiguate this. Let's keep civil now shall we? Cream147 Shout at me for doing wrong
  • Disambiguate great candidate for dab page. - grubber 19:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate per FrozenPurpleCube. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 23:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.