The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Original research, without anything approaching reliable sources. No source sited meets WP:RS. Falls under WP:BALLS and violates WP:Neutral point of view. Delete, as it is a non-notable conspiracy theory. Brimba 15:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Strong delete. Fails WP:NPOV and is just conspiracycruft. This did happen, but this is not the right article to discuss it (though we don't really need one). --Coredesattalk. ^_^ 19:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.