Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation: R.O.B.B.E.R.S.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Johnleemk | Talk 12:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Operation: R.O.B.B.E.R.S.

Near-incoherent, nonsensical synopsis of an episode of an obscure cartoon. Delete, or at least merge with the main article. Neutrality^talk 03:39, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete for having an incoherent synopsis, but I disagree with calling Codename: Kids Next Door obscure. It's on Cartoon Network for crying out loud! - Mgm|^(talk) 10:31, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: I don't know whether it's a real episode or not (looks like it isn't), but the article is authentic fan gibberish. Geogre 14:48, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Obscure? Did you see the category box ({{KND}}) at the bottom of the main Kids Next Door page? :) The series is a very popular one, and the episode is real: [1]. The synposis looks a little shaky, but that seems to me to necessitate a {{cleanup}}, {{verify}}, or {{expert}} tag. Turnstep 20:27, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (or merge). The episode may be a real one, but I see no evidence that it's notable enough to deserve an article all of its very own. Synopses of non-notable episodes of not-actually-all-that-famous shows belong in the articles on the seasons they're part of. — Haeleth Talk 22:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Deltee seems nn.  Grue  09:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I agree with Turnstep. This is not an 'obscure' cartoon, it is quite popular. I'm in college and I even watch it. I see plenty of other series here on Wikipedia that the episodes have their own articles, I see no reason to get rid of this one. It was even well written and very descriptive, but does need some cleanup. Lancer Sykera 22:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.