Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open sources of information
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Veinor (talk to me) 02:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Open sources of information
This page appears to have been created for advertising purposes. It has since been abandoned, but even if it were still active, it would not be appropriate for Wikipedia. The title is a vague neologism, so I don't think there's any need for an article here. Terraxos (talk) 21:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Inappropriate use of Wiki space. Consider speedy delete. Renee (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No non-automated edits since 2006, a bunch of sections are empty, and there's still a "temporary note" atop the article? Looks like an abandoned project to me. Zetawoof(ζ) 22:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
