Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Source Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Open Source Pictures

Open Source Pictures (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable company[1] Coo53 01:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

This is an article about a company that has proper sources. I'd say Keep it. connor.carey 01:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

What proper sources? The two websites which are owned by the company? The list of Delaware-incorporated corporations? None of these meets the requirements for sourcing. Corvus cornix 21:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Can't find any reliable sources in an intial search. The name doesn't even return the company's own web site in the google top 10 results.--Torchwood Who? 01:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I failed to find secondaries sources that are independent to meets the notability. Carlosguitar 05:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N. First few pages of Google search showed no results for this particular company. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) (review) 22:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.