Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenNAP

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP — Gwalla | Talk 21:12, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] OpenNAP

Appears to be a defunct OSS project. Don't think this is notable, feel that it should be deleted. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Comment By following the link at the bottom of the page opennap-ng.sourcefourge.net you'll see updates as recent as April. Though I'm not familiar enough with the topic to judge notability, there is evidence that the project is still active.Tobycat 04:54, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Real, popular protocol in use, one of the earliest responses to the Napster lawsuit. WinMX is an OpenNap client, for example. Hardly defunct. — Gwalla | Talk 07:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep popular song file protocol. JamesBurns 10:45, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This *is* notable. Kaibabsquirrel 05:42, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as something that appears al least somewhat notable, and is definately not gibberish or self-promotion. Falcon 23:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep OpenNap is historically notable. If one argues that Napster had no influence on the world musically and legally by facilitating file-sharing, one can discount OpenNap, the open source version of the Napster server and protocol. It is historically significant, socially significant and significant to international computer file-sharing law. unsigned vote by Merek (talk · contribs)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.