Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opa

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Transwiki. Redwolf24 (talk) 01:50, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Opa

• Transwiki Dictionary definition bogdan | ^Talk 16:35, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wiktionary. Alf 21:08, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep after merging it with previously deleted Opa! or Transwiki. Comment I would also need to point that Category:Vocabulary_and_usage_stubs are candidate to be moved to Wiktionary. We don't have to delete other's people work, when we can move it to the right place. The Wikipedia project has great potentials, and I believe we should try to achieve them.MATIA 19:36, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment After Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Opa!, information that I've added on Opa! is lost. Hopefully it'll be added here by User:Redwolf24, so that opa can be kept or transwikified the right way. I must remind you If you come across an article that is nothing more than a definition, see if there is information you can add that would be appropriate for an encyclopedia.

MATIA 14:56, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

• Transwiki, unless, as MATIA suggests above, this article can be beefed up to be encyclopedic. Right now, this article is almost archetypally a dictionary entry. – Friejose 17:47, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.