Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ooze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 17:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ooze

Ooze (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

AfD nominated by Kamope with reason: "Why would an article have one sentence of scientific content then all of sudden go to fiction? This article should be deleted." This is a procedural nomination - my opinion is Neutral. Tevildo 23:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

It should probably be reformatted for consistency with other disambiguation pages, because that's what it is, but Keep. -- Jake 23:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Adding, it had the disambig template until Kamope removed it while adding the PROD. It was tagged uncategorized later. -- Jake 23:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep but reformat to make more of a disambig. FrozenPurpleCube 23:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

• Now I agree with Jake and FrozenPurpleCube. Sorry for removing disambig template. Kamope 23:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

To make up for removing the disambig template, if it is agreed to keep the article but format it to look more like a disambiguation page, I will do it. Kamope 00:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Useful disambiguation. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as disambig. Havocrazy 22:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above.--CJ King 04:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.