Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online video game rental

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 05:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Online video game rental

Online video game rental (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I'm pretty sure that the project does not exist to provide free online price comparisons for commercial companies. Completely unencyclopaedic Spartaz Humbug! 18:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment. I believe you mean unencyclopedic. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete, possibly even a speedy G11 as spam. Seems to be nothing more than spam. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - I think it could stay if its formatted a little better to look like Comparison of Internet forum software (PHP) Corpx 02:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - I was searching for information about online game rentals and found it here at Wikipedia. Perhaps the prices could be removed, but what's wrong with a definition of this service that lists the alternatives? I'd feel differently if this page were spam for a particular service, but it is not spam. 20:38, 27 July 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.6.46.71 (talk • contribs)
  • Weak keep per Corpx, despite the WP:ILIKEIT argument by the anonymous editor. --Aarktica 01:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and TPH. J-stan Talk 20:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete view without prejudice to the creation of an encyclopedic article. Actually, it is an interesting phenomenon and worthy of encyclopedic treatment. However, this is not it. At the moment it is simply a narrowly targeted list of commercial providers. However, if someone wishes to produce a sensible article then that's fine by me. Bridgeplayer 22:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.