Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oneupweb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 05:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oneupweb

Oneupweb (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This was proded for lack of notability. There are some real claims to notability here. I thought it prudent to bring here for further dicussion. I am officially neutral on this one. Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Comment -- I'm not seeing the claims of notability. Could you enlighten us as to what you're seeing? Thanks! --Fabrictramp (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Reply The article has reference to reliable sources (wired magazine) as well as a list of Awards, which may or may not in themselves be notable. These may not be enough for notability, but they at least are enough to ask for more comment. I may vote either way myself, but I need to see what others think before deciding. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 18:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the enlightenment!--Fabrictramp (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless claims of WP:Notability can be improved. Is not listed in the 2007 winners on the Addy Award website[1], links on Michigan 50 website are not working, Wired magazine article is a passing mention. Can't find evidence showing that the ClickZ award is notable -- everything I'm seeing is a press release.--Fabrictramp (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 19:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the issues mentioned above. The actual Addy page is http://www.aafd6.org/addys/D6Addy_2007.asp. I could send people here, but I thought it would be more useful to send them to the top level.

For the Michigan 50, it is a cookie issue. I could not get the page to work when I went back to it. The site has instructions for fixing this.

• 1. Check the cookie settings in your browser
• 2. Look for a cookie called "companiestowatch.org"
• 3. Delete the cookie
• 4. Click the web link again

Monitorfuse (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)monitorfuse

So for the Addy Award, this was a local chapter's award, rather than a national award?--Fabrictramp (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Correct. The award is for District 6. Should I put that in the copy?

Monitorfuse (talk) 21:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)monitorfuse

Thanks to all of you that took the time to respond. I understand the concerns that you have outlined, and hope that I have addressed them. If there is anything else that I can do, please let me know.

Monitorfuse (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)monitorfuse

Sorry for being a pest, but I was hoping to hear from someone on anything I could do for this entry. Is the discussion closed?

Monitorfuse (talk) 13:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)monitorfuse

The discussion will remain open for approximately 1 week, or until an administrator has determined that enough users have commented to reach a consensus on how to handle it. Several editors have noted shortcomings in their requests to delete the article. Perhaps you could fix those problems, or contact those editors directly for more explanation of their concerns? --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Jayron32. I tried to address their concerns and added additional resources. I will contact them directly.

Monitorfuse (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Monitorfuse

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.