Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Ignoring consensus, I'm redirecting this article to Onett (EarthBound); it's a much better article that if nominated for deletion, would likely receive a different result. If you'd like to get rid of it altogether, please nominate the aforementioned article for deletion. Ral315 (talk) 02:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Onett

Do we really need another page for a video game level? Delete. --Nlu 17:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Merge. We may. Trollderella 21:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge to EarthBound. Definitely non-noteable on its own. HackJandy 02:11, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
    • Non-notable is definately non part of deletion policy, on it's own, or with anything else! ;) Trollderella 02:34, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Unless the lack of credible sources is remedied, this appears to violate Wikipedia:Verifiability--redstucco 11:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Move info and delete, and fix any links etc. I was going to vote merge, but I don't see a need to have a redirect page from an article of this name. Completely verifyable: google for 'onett earthbound' link. Or look at any of a couple dozen entries at gameFAQs link. Or download a SNES emulator and the ROM file and play it (you should do this anyway, it's a really fun game). --Qirex 13:18, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge. Redirect pages are cheap, and the edit history needs to be preserved to keep the GFDL happy. — Haeleth Talk 17:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge into Onett (EarthBound) and then move that article to Onett. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 02:13, 3 December 2005 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.