Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneClimate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] OneClimate

No establishment of notability. Speedy declined without explanation. here we are. Blogs do not establish notability. WP:WEB Crossmr 15:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete; no assertion of importance. —Caesura^(t) 16:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. per nom. Hammer1980·^talk 17:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I presume speedy was denied because the subject's notability was asserted, however it is unverifiable. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 22:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

  Hence the problem with the wording. Anyone can "Assert" notability. Assertion needs to come with verifiable citation in a reasonable time frame, otherwise its meaningless. Admins need to recognize this.--Crossmr (talk) 00:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Some of them do. Actually, I would have denied speedy on this one myself. I said delete and I should have said strong delete, but not speedy. Looks like it's gonna be snowballed, though. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 00:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball/Speedy as advert. --Thinboy00 @27, i.e. 23:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.