Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One-21

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] One-21

One-21 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Band with no assertion of notability, fails WP:MUSIC notability criteria, no reliable sources Stormie (talk) 00:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Stormie (talk) 00:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I've had a pretty good look around. The name isn't helping, but I can't find anything substantial. The Band has never charted on the Christian Music charts, according to Billboard. The only possible argument I can see per WP:BAND is if someone wants to argue that the band's label is "one of the more important indie labels" but I can't find any evidence to support that either. Debate (talk) 00:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, I think you'd have trouble arguing that any of the labels that this band have been on are "one of the more important indie labels". Would not appear to meet WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC).
• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as non notable per above.--Berig (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I couldn't find any info that shows that they're notable. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 19:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing notable on this group sadly. Artene50 (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.