Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On rye

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] On rye

Vanity, not-notable. Google search: 14 unique hits. Sir Isaac Lime 01:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep, if the claims in the article can be verified. For great justice. 01:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, something tells me they have potential. Delete, WP:VSCA Royboycrashfan 01:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete No IMDB entry, either for the group or its members. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn/vanity. Geogre's Law confirmed for the billionth time. dbtfztalk 01:40, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as absolute crap with delusions of grandeur. Brian G. Crawford 02:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete rubbish.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete no credible assertion of notability. Fagstein 04:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. --Siva1979Talk to me 04:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per all of the above. YellowPigNowNow 05:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity and nn. --Terence Ong 09:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nothing of note here Deizio 16:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but rename (move) as Amateur film groups to chronicle the phenomenon of such groups on the internet and elsewhere. Tyrenius 01:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete have to agree its Vanity. There are no sources cited. Perhaps flag to add sources but if none show up, then Delete. : ( Lonesomedovechocolate 02:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Fishhead64 04:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Jonas Silk 21:30, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom -- Argon233 T @ C  U ∠  06:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable, them kids are havin' fun though. --MrFizyx 22:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable. --Wizardman 22:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.