Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On Heresies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] On Heresies

We already have an article called Heresy and this is pure original research. Article was deproded by original author, so I am bringing here. JChap 19:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Burn at the stake. WP:VSCA and WP:OR. Sandstein 19:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • LOL - this seems rather logical to do with this article. --P199 21:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the content, but that title might be helpful as a Redirect to Against Heresies BigDT 19:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio as well as OR. B.Wind 20:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom and it is advertisement as well (see last couple of paragraphs in article). --P199 21:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as quickly as possible. The author is a misguided faithful. --Lambiam^Talk 23:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. An ad as well as the very definition of original research (since the conclusions in the article no doubt come from the author's book.) Grandmasterka 02:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.