Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmniPlan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. CitiCat ^♫ 02:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] OmniPlan

OmniPlan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable software - no WP:RS to indicate notability. Leuko 03:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless sources giving coverage are found Corpx 05:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - given the degree of dedication to the other articles in the group, I'd highly suggest a merge into the main operator's article. This is a notable and well-known piece of software, its sister, OmniOutliner is distributed with all new Macs. It's been written about in MacWorld and TUAW, the Observer, and other software review sites that give the same coverage to lesser-known but definitely notable products like Adobe InDesign or even Notepad (which is not lesser-known but those are the sites that it uses as citations). ALTON .ıl 08:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Only the MacWorld article covers the software in a non-trivial way. The others are merely announcements of of the product, so they don't really establish notability. Leuko 22:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

  They aren't announced in either of those sources unless they are major releases to the Mac world. I personally don't use the product, and this isn't something I'm throwing myself off a cliff for, but again I vouch for a merge at the very least. ALTON .ıl 01:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Merge into The Omni Group. The only third-party reliable source seems to be the Macworld review, and that isn't enough to establish notability. Jakew 10:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 15:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M.V.E.i. (talk • contribs) 19:41, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
  • Based on??? AfD's are a discussion, not a vote. Leuko 22:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I'd argue that they are notable, at least based on this ComputerWorld article [1]. It shouldn't be hard to find other tech review sites talking about them, although most will be Mac based, given that's who Omni develops for. --Bfigura ^(talk) 21:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.