Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmenServe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was NO CONSENSUS TO DELETE. Actually, there were no delete votes. Basically, there wasn't a quorum. But the four editors who did respond all wanted the keep the informationm, the only question was whether thru Keep or Merge. So I chose the least destructive, Keep. But since there was no quorum, I called it a No Consensus. I could have relisted the article, but I didn't think this was necessary as no one (except the nominator) wanted to delete the information. Herostratus 05:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] OmenServe
I don't think filesharing scripts deserve their own articles. Sysreset, Polaris, etc. don't have articles. If anything, this should be merged into Internet Relay Chat or MIRC script.
See also Wikipedia:Notability (software) Ashibaka tock 20:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into one of those. If it's used by 90% of listservers, then it's notable enough for a merge. (|-- UlTiMuS ( U • T • C | M • E ) 21:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- I kind of doubt that statistic but of course there is no reliable source for anything :/ Ashibaka tock 21:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I see no need to merge the article with IRC or mIRC scripts - both are already overly cluttered. Also, it meets #2 in proposed Wikipedia:Notability (software). OmenServe has spawned various clones ([1], [2], [3]) and translations ([4]). DLX 11:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. As an mIRC user, I find Omenserve to be one of the best serving scripts around. I think the article is necessary and needed, and will, when completed, help newbies and general file sharing users to find and use one of the better scripts available for mIRC.
- Merge, it will help the average person find the article. And if the article grows then it can be seperated, I highly doubt it will become that big though. BadCRC 19:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.