Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ollie Stanbridge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ollie Stanbridge
Non-notable footballer as he has never played a notable league Eddie6705 (talk) 00:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Eddie6705 (talk) 00:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Subject does not appear notable as I read WP:ATHLETE. The article for the Southern Football League, in which this footballer plays, states that the league is comprised of semi-pro and amateur clubs. WP:ATHLETE requires play in a fully professional league or at the highest level of amateur play. The article on Southern Football League Premier Division, the division in which this athlete plays, states that it is the seventh tier in the English football league system which clearly indicates that this is not the highest level. OlenWhitaker • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 01:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Question Southern League Premier Division is not a notable league? I'm not familiar with English football, but Stanbridge has received coverage TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 01:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I'd have to say I agree with the nom. I like to think that if I'd stayed in the UK I might have played for Brackley myself (I was in a team that was basically a "feeder" youth side)... but it certainly isn't at the level of notability (good to see they finished this season one place above Banbury, though :) As to TC's query, the BGB Southern League is notable enough for teams to have articles (it is three flights below the bottom of the official English Football League, and therefore flight seven in the greater scheme of things); it is not, however, notable enoguh for individual players to have articles. Perhaps a smerge of info into the article on the club as part of a "current squad' section is worthwhile? Grutness...wha? 01:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the explanation, I don't know too much about the structure of leagues, but that made it clear. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 01:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above --Lemmey talk 04:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable. Titanium Dragon (talk) 07:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as not notable.--Berig (talk) 09:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable per WP:Athlete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. BanRay 12:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 13:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete ditto. RC-0722 247.5/1 19:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination --Jimbo[online] 22:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.