Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Saint
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Award appears to meet the brick of WP:PORNBIO. (nonadmin) Navou 17:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Olivia Saint
The current version contains no assertion of notability (say by WP:PORNBIO), thus the article qualifies for deletion. Fresh 20:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete While Ass Cream Pies may be an epic story worthy of numerous Oscar nominations, she's still not notable enough per WP:PORNBIO. Wildthing61476 21:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Good one.--Fresh 21:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable porn actress in one named film not keepable. —Gaff ταλκ 21:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- delete. This person fails the notability standard, that much is obvious. Firestorm 21:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - is this a joke? Her style, originality, timing and mood show a remarkable sense of presence and dynamic self expression. - in the film Ass Cream Pies?! Really? Non-notable! --Haemo 22:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree. It does fail WP:PORNBIO. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 22:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Tabercil 22:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 22:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment She won a 2002 XRCO award for Unsung Siren. Epbr123 22:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep 245 films is notable enough for me. And will keep me occupied for a while. Xanucia 23:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as notable per WP:PORNBIO: XRCO award winner. Tabercil 04:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep winning an award means satisfying the notability criteria. -- fdewaele, 8 June 2007, 16:18.
- Keep per XRCO award. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 08:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.